ISA Debate – Stirring granny panties in soapy water

21 Oct

As usual wtf, the bloody online debate cannot get itself sorted out, it’s like stirring granny panties at high speed in soapy water and one would mistake it to be a lacy t-back of a young shenton way exec. People calling for anti-terror law to replace ISA, another calling for judicial review of the detentions, others say ISA perpetuate climate of fear, ex-detainees call for the abolishment of ISA, some calling for COI of Marxists arrests, but almost everyone miraculously agrees with terrorists being locked away since 2001 with nearly no one paying attention to them and hardcore gang leaders, loan sharks and drug lords being detained without trial under Criminal Law (Temporary Provision).

Let’s be clear, Singapore and Malaysia never kena bomb is not because of ISA but economic progress, social safety nets and relative religious freedom (we did it despite a ban on open sale of porn). However, for the radical and violent, these creature and spiritual comforts are irrelevant once they have decided to hijack Islam for political ends.

The ISA was designed to deal with evil who want to bomb the holy raffles place and take out all the hot young babes to heaven with them. But the preventive nature of ISA upsets many, including me, as it runs contrary to basic tenets such as “innocent unless proven guilty”, “right to a fair trial” and “retributive punishment”.

Detention without trial is the crux of the matter. The spectrum of the debate can be reduced to a utilitarian and dentological ethics approach. A utilitarian approach (the ends) would argue that detention without trial is necessary evil given the dire consequences and to ensure that ordinary lives can still go on normally. A dentological approach (the means) would argue that detention without trial is unethical and potential perpetrators should be brought to trial soonest thus ensuring that civil liberties are protected. One Ah Beng approach and the other Ang Mo Pai principled approach.

But once again our so called internet ‘debate’ looks like the uber cool clusterfuck granny panties stirring anti-pap show with no intellectual rigor. Only two parties have made their stance clear. The WP agrees with detention without trial and an advisory board but calls for the ISA to be replaced with anti-terror law. Former detainees Vincent Cheng, Teo Soh Lung et al disagrees vehemently with detention without trial and calls for the ISA to be repealed period. Paiseh, the third is PAP lor.

The rest of the faggot online civil society shift, squirm and hinge on to any and every argument to pander to their readers and supporters, like the ktv girl who act virgin to get more tips from you. If you see no need for detention without trial under any circumstances, and all cases can be trialed in open court, then by all means call for a COI or judicial review on every single ISA arrest made.

If there is a need for detention without trial, then calling for a judicial review and COI is plain bullshit. Detention without trial is preventive and non-public in nature, it’s not even a matter of guilty or innocent since no crime was committed, so how could a COI or any court for that matter decide conclusively and absolutely and account to the public transparently?! You trust no safeguards unless the ISA is administered by you.

Any decision made by the COI can be and would be called a “speculative” judgment. Ultimately, it’s an executive decision taken by the politicians which they argue is for the public good at the expense of the individual’s civil liberties. The question is: Do you trust Pinky Loong with it?

So I see some out there who state explicitly that detention without trial trust is against their beliefs and they will never trust PAP with it, that’s fine and great, it’s your right. The problem I have is those who agree with detention without trial but call for xxxxx safeguards and yyyyy inquiries only shy of asking Chee Soon Juan and Aristotle to sit on the Advisory Board; another bunch also agrees with detention without trial but never under the evil empire of Hatchet Lee and his wicked PAP.

Hand in hand they stir the soapy water with granny panties to make it look like the sexy and liberal t-back while many of the ill-informed and lethargic lap up the rhetoric like honey water.

My readers, are you a utilitarian or dentologist? A chow ah beng or ang moh pai? There is no right or wrong, but fence sitters and opportunists are frowned upon in such a serious matter. Fence sitters blur the fundamental questions and mislead others.

My friends, the real albatross over a more progressive Singapore political culture is the GRC system, the henpecked mainstream media, the materialistic and competitive Singapore culture, the over indulgence of our youths in electronic games (and not books) and not the ISA who has not deter those willing and able like Chen Show Mao, Low Thia Khiang and Sylvia Lim to rise to the highest organization in our land.

Advertisements

5 Responses to “ISA Debate – Stirring granny panties in soapy water”

  1. Betsey March 28, 2013 at 6:03 am #

    What a data of un-ambiguity and preserveness of precious knowledge about unpredicted feelings.

  2. Patsy April 8, 2013 at 11:19 am #

    I simply could not leave your site before
    suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard info
    an individual provide on your visitors? Is gonna be again steadily to check
    out new posts

  3. Darby July 19, 2013 at 10:31 pm #

    Many thanks for sharing that terrific written content on your site.
    I ran into it on google. I am planning to check back
    again once you publish much more aricles.

  4. making bread May 22, 2014 at 2:45 am #

    I am curious to find out what blog system you have been using?

    I’m experiencing some small security issues with my latest website and I’d like to find something more safeguarded.
    Do you have any suggestions?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Mai Luan Luan Gong Leh: Teo Soh Lung Say JI member is political exile « Unbranded Bread n Butter - October 12, 2012

    […] stand corrected. Last year I said every-mother-son agrees with terrorist being locked away. Apparently granny Teo disagress!! Can’t really blame her. She is still stuck in […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: