ISA Debate – Part II

24 Oct


Siew Kum Hong also kind of agree with detention without trial although this doesn’t come out quite clearly in TOC where he is part of the leadership. But again, he says he ‘usually’ can accept the need for preventive detention, that can also mean he might not. I suspect it has something to do with the safeguards and reviews mechanism, maybe he has a special well-kept Jewish machine to look inside the minds of terrorists? Just kidding. He sees the speech as filled with strawmen while maybe the other side will see Siew filled with cheemness and –isms. If Singapore got anti-terrorism act, I will vote for Siew Kum Hong to sit on the Advisory Board because zheng hu still own him one more term of NMP.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: